Wednesday, September 7, 2011

On "Calvinist Worship"

Calvinism has always sought to remove distractions from the due worship belonging to the Triune God. In our day, churches strive on making worship culturally relevant. In the minds of many, the church must create a worship setting that resembles the world inorder to captivate the culture. They fail to realize that by structuring worship in direct likeness to the culture, worship is subject to change and left at the imagination of finite men. No longer is "..singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord "(Col 3:16) enough, no. The preacher must now rely on something other than what God has commanded as worship, inorder to keep his congregation satisfied. Here is renowned church historian Owen Chadwick on Calvinist Worship and the removal of distractions during the Reformation:


"The Swiss principle demanded Scriptural authority for all things in ecclesiastical polity and the worship of the Church. Simplicity was godly, all else was distraction. The medieval church seemed to the Reformed like an overfurnished clutter, a shop of antique junk, where the worshipper could not apprehend true holiness because his vision was screened by trinkets, side altars, statues, coloured windows, pomp, vestments, saints, and ceremonies, as though the listening ears of prayer were deafend by the clangour of ritual noise. Some simple folk, especially women, regretted the loss of colour, the departure of the statues and banners. Not so the true Calvinist. He felt as though he had been present at a cleansing of the Temple, elevated and purged in spirit, conscious of a wind of Hebraic purity rushing through the church, sweeping away squalor and superstition and the ornaments which anchored his soul to earth."


awretchsaved

*Chadiwck, Owen. The Reformation. London: Penguin, 1990. (Pg.184-185)

8 comments:

  1. I don't think labling simplicity as godly is wholly true... I think u would agree. As far as structuring worship, what would this particular Reformed "simple" worship service be modled (structured) after? I think this post has went to one extream without qualifying the other...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The reason why the simplicity of worship is godly, is because it is biblical. Biblical New Testament worship for the church is exactly that, simple. No dramas, no plays, etc.

    Surely our hearts need to be in the right place, and God ought to be the center of our worship, without that, even a "simple" worship, will be ungodly.

    A Reformed worship service, as I implied before, is modeled after the bible. We sing to God, the word is preached, and that is all. We seek to not add things (in our service) not ordered directly by God, because if we do, we would be distracting our church members, and most importantly, offering strange fire to God.

    If you consider a simple worship service like the N.T as extreme, then by all means, call this extreme.

    There will be other posts about the other side, that believes that anything not prohibited as worship, is suitable for worship. The intention of this post was NOT to give a thorough lengthy refutation. Sorry. There are other sites that have, might I direct you to some:

    http://www.apuritansmind.com/puritan-worship/strange-fire-by-dr-c-matthew-mcmahon/

    http://www.monergism.com/directory/search.php?action=search_links_simple&search_kind=and&phrase=regulative+principle

    ReplyDelete
  3. They had no choice but for it to be that way. I would't call it extream; it is what it is. I guess they could have gotten all the good singers and dancers and got them to join the church. Even if their were saved "good" passionate singers or dancers with hearts set on the gospel, we have no account of them in the new testament, especially not given an opportunity to showcase their talents above the word of God.

    Outside looking in to the post, it seems, u make everything besides the singing of the congregation unprofitable....

    Bro, do you have a piano in your church?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You wrote: "they had no choice but for it to be that way"

    Yet you agree that there were singers, and dancers, so, they did have a choice, it just wasn't instituted in the N.T as worship. And, there is a good reason for that.

    I believe that the preaching of God's word is profitable, the Lord's ordinances, and those things that are acceptable as worship. I don't believe we are free to create or add things to God's worship- for it is He and He alone that has the right to prescribe to sinful man how he is to worship Him.

    Yes, there is a piano in the church I attend.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What are we supposed to judge simple as? Indeed, riding behind a horse in a carrige is more simple than riding in a technologically advanced automobile... but neither are wrong; one has its benefits while the other is oly encouraged by cults that insist in refusing to use a car. I'm not saying that church has to make the technological leaps, as in big sound system, fancy light system, cool llokin preacher with glasses and spiky hair, etc...

    like I said how are we to judge simple? Indeed, the early church was simple compared to today. We have lights, bathrooms, cushioned pews, possibly even a man standing up on the stage with a guitar and amp... what are we to judge simple as? Compared to what? The early church, the church in 1940, the future church of 2040?? The bible dosnt give us enough to say that the guy standing on stage with an acoustic guitar and amp, is too distracting, or indeed is simple. We have to use discernment, and not solely base our "godly simplicity" on the tradition of man...

    ReplyDelete
  6. You said: "Indeed, riding behind a horse in a carrige is more simple than riding in a technologically advanced automobile... but neither are wrong;"

    You are comparing the ordered worship of God with the advancement in transportation?! Of course it isn't wrong to have an automobile. Now, If God had said "I want you to use a horse in a carriage", would you go out and get yourself an automobile? I wouldn't. Because God has told us (hypothetically speaking) what sort of transportation we should use. So, since God has told us how we are to worship Him, why do you think it is a good idea to go out and invent ways of worshiping Him?
    We are not speaking of using lights here, or pews.

    Worship is being defined here as the part in service where we glorify God through song.

    You answered your own question: "We have to use discernment" This is why a simple worship like the one administered in the N.T is not only the best for the church, but the most, obviously- biblical. We ought to not distract our fellow brethren from the pure worship of God, and, having people dancing around, jumping up and down, is distracting, and might I add, it goes against what Paul says in 1st Corinthians 14:40 (in regards to worship):

    "But all things should be done decently and in order"

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ok so where is this explicit ordered worship described in the NT? In contrast to my "inventing ways to worship him?" Btw, I like how u assume I'm some charismatic freak also. I can assure you, that is not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Ok so where is this explicit ordered worship described in the NT?"

    Explicit? Well, it depends what you mean by that. If you are looking for what kind of pews to sit in, or what sort of light bulbs to use, you won't get an answer from the bible. These are circumstantial. But, there are those things which have religious significance and directly effect the content of worship, and those are worship ordinances that we do have.

    Forexample: the preaching of the word; Lk. 2:46; Acts 8:31; Jas. 1:22; Lk. 4:20; Acts 20:9

    or

    The Administration of sacraments: Matt. 28:19; Matt. 26:26-29; 1 Cor. 11:24-25

    Friend, assuming you are a protestant, and as a protestant, hold to sola-scriptura, don't you think it is logically consistent that we ought to draw our worship from the word of God?

    I never assumed you were a Charismatic. Though, it seems that your reasoning can lead to a charismatic worship.

    ReplyDelete